UxnotivoResearch · Insights · Clarity
Usability research for US websites

UX Research for Websites People Understand and Actually Use

We watch how real people move through your site, find the moments where they hesitate or give up, and write down what to change in words your whole team can act on.

  • Task-based testing
  • Expert usability review
  • Journey mapping
  • Clear next steps

Research Note

Three of five sample participants missed the pricing link because it sat inside a menu labeled Resources. Rename the label, then test again.

Illustrative note
What we do

Research That Explains Behavior

Analytics can tell you that people leave a page. They cannot tell you why. Each of our nine services answers a different version of that question, from a quick expert audit to sessions with real participants, and one project can combine two or three of them. All nine are listed here.

See every service
  • UX Research

    Moderated tests and interviews with people who match your audience, so you see the real reasons behind the numbers.

  • Usability Audits

    An expert review of your key pages and flows, with ranked issues, screenshots and specific fixes for each one.

  • Journey Mapping

    Evidence-based journey maps that show goals, doubts and drop-off points at every stage of the visitor's path.

  • Conversion Friction Analysis

    A close, step-by-step review of one money path that logs every obstacle and explains how to remove it.

  • UX Recommendations

    A ranked backlog of specific changes with evidence, acceptance criteria and effort, ready for your team.

  • A/B Testing Guidance

    Test plans with a clear hypothesis, a sample size fixed in advance and a search-safe setup, plus a review of results.

  • Accessibility Research

    Sessions with assistive technology users plus a WCAG 2.2 review, so you find barriers that checklists miss.

  • Mobile Usability

    Testing on real phones for tap targets, forms, menus, speed and layout, with fixes ranked by severity.

  • Information Architecture

    Card sorting and tree testing to build menus and labels that match how your visitors think.

How it works

A Four-Step Way of Working

Every project follows the same order, so you always know what comes next and what you will receive at the end of each step.

Read the full process
  1. 01

    Learn the Goals

    We agree on the questions, the audience and the pages that matter before any testing begins, then put it all in a written plan.

  2. 02

    Observe and Review

    We run task-based sessions, an expert review or both, and record exactly where people hesitate, misread or give up.

  3. 03

    Explain the Findings

    Each issue is written up with evidence, a severity rating and a plain description of the cause, then walked through with your team.

  4. 04

    Plan the Fixes

    You get a ranked list of changes, sized by effort, with notes on what to measure and what to test next.

What you receive

What an Audit Gives You

Every audit ends with the same four things, whatever its size. We do not promise lifts or percentages. Results depend on your traffic, your offer and what your team builds next. What we can promise is a clear, evidence-backed picture of the problems and a sensible order for fixing them.

See the sample report structure
  • Ranked FindingsEach issue rated by severity and how many tasks it touches
  • Clear EvidenceClips, quotes or screenshots behind every finding
  • Fix GuidanceConcrete changes your team can build, not vague advice
  • Retest PlanWhat to measure and retest once changes ship
Illustrative, fictional site A decorative before and after mockup of a fictional landing page.
Free tools

Try Our Free UX Tools

Three small tools that run in your browser, for teams who want to start before hiring anyone. Nothing you type leaves the page, nothing is stored, and each tool exports a plain text file you can paste into tickets or notes.

All tools
Our standards

What We Check Before Recommending Changes

Every recommendation passes the same three questions before it goes into a report. If one fails, the finding is either tested further or left out, so your team only spends time on changes with a reason behind them.

  • Did a real person struggle here?

    Findings from sessions carry more weight than opinions. Expert-review findings are labeled as such.

    Evidence first

  • Is the cause clear and specific?

    We describe the cause in plain words so your designers and developers do not have to guess what we meant.

    Root cause, not symptom

  • Is the fix worth the effort?

    Each change is sized against its likely effect on the task and the work it needs, so your team can start where it matters and park the rest.

    Ranked by priority

Ready to See Your Site Through Your Visitors' Eyes?

Tell us what the site is for and where you think people get stuck. We reply with questions, a proposed method and a written scope before any work starts, and there is no charge for that first step.

  • No obligation
  • Written scope
  • Plain-English findings